– Highlights

highlight
Mca Collection

MCA Collection: Today Tomorrow Yesterday

01 Sep - 31 Dec

highlight
Exhibition

Kader Attia

12 Apr - 30 Jul

highlight
Exhibition

Jenny Watson

05 Jul - 02 Oct

– Learning Events

highlight
Special Event

ARTBAR June 2017

30 Jun, 7.00pm, MCA

highlight
Talk

NAIDOC Week 2017

05 Jul, 5.30pm, Level 2: Veolia Lecture Theatre

highlight
Event

Master Class For Teachers

09 Jul, 10.00am, Level 3: National Centre for Creative Learning

– News from inside the MCA

5 Years of ARTBAR

Roaming carrots, Hummer limos, tea ceremonies and bikes in the galleries. Five years proof that anything can happen at #MCAARTBAR more

MCA at the 2017 Venice Biennale

Canals, cats and curators. Clothilde Bullen reflects on the experience of attending the 2017 Venice Biennale on the occasion of Tracey Moffat’s Australian Pavilion. more

From the archives: Unconventional Materials

From the Archives is our blog series unearthing gems from the MCA’s archives, written by resident archivist Stephanie Ferrara more

– Spotlights from the collection online

highlight
MCA Collection

Works from the MCA Collection

highlight
Collection Artist Interviews

Watch our latest interviews in the MCA Video Portal

highlight
Joint acquisitions by MCA and Tate

The Program promotes Australian art globally, helping Australian artists reach new audiences.

Blog – Interview with December film curator Kiki Fung

Posted on Dec. 8, 2016 by James Vaughan in Interviews. View Comments
Our contemporary film series invites guest curators to blur the lines between visual art and cinema. Guest curators select films that will be screened free onsite at MCA.

James Vaughan and Jeremy Elphick speak to the Head Programmer for Australia’s Brisbane Asia Pacific Film Festival, Kiki Fung about the month of contemporary cinema she has guest curated for the Museum in December.


Kiki, you’ve just wrapped up your third year at the helm of Brisbane Asia Pacific Film Festival (BAPFF), a couple of days ago. You must be exhausted. How do feel the festival went?

Indeed! The festival went very well this year. After 3 editions, I’d hope to think that we have defined our program direction – a program that is dedicated to unique voices, cinematic visions and cultural diversity (or may I say, narrative diversity). We are honoured to showcase many films from the Asia Pacific region that reflect their countries’ cultural identity and artistic expression. There is still so much more to explore, cinematically, from this region. We anticipate to see many more that counter mainstream filmmaking and that will take us very far, imaginatively and spiritually.

As the quality of your program attests, it’s an exciting time for contemporary cinema! Are there are any films from the last few years that have really altered the way you see the world, or perhaps, the way you think or view film?

It is hard to single out just a few films that changed the way I think of cinema but there are indeed some that left very strong impression. For example, J.P. Sniadecki’s Iron Ministry (2013), one of the films from the Harvard Sensory Ethnographical Lab, shot entirely on a number of trains in China, is a very good example of where interesting contemporary cinema could head towards. It is at once hypnotic, experiential, but also socially and politically revelatory. It is something beyond documentary; it is visual poetry that is closely grounded in reality but also incredibly dreamlike. I would love to see more of this kind of films. Likewise, in this year Midi Z’s City of Jade opens new dimension of documentary filmmaking, transforming a record of his brother’s jade-minding venture into a deep, personal exploration of obsession.

Both Wong Kar-wai’s The Grandmaster (2013) and Hou Hsiao-hsien’s The Assassin (2015) are triumph of form and their new rendition of the martial arts genre excited me as to what cinema is and can be. These two films proved that it is possible for martial art films to be artistic, romantic, and philosophical (I think both films embraced and elaborated on Taoist philosophy in their spirit). Of course, the process of re-inventing the genre started from King Hu. The Assassin is at once classical (referencing the beauty and aesthetic of classical Chinese poetry) and modern (in its elliptical narrative and its resistance to define or explain, in its moments of psychological depth).

Jia Zhangke’s Mountains May Depart (2015) received mixed responses from critics and audience, but his cinema is consistently articulate and precise, and I responded very strongly to this film. I am fascinated by the originality and creativity in many Chinese independent films, however very few contemporary Chinese filmmakers (post the Fifth Generation) are able to address China’s current social condition and its people’s spiritual and emotional state as concisely and daringly (but not sensationally or over-radically) as Jia. Many symbols and gestures in this film (including its use of pop music) speak to the collective memory, pain and loss of the Chinese people. Above the emotional impact, it is also full of cinematic beauty.

You’ve put together a 3-week program for the MCA: 'The Theatre-ality of Cinema’. Cinema and theatre have a fascinating history of push and pull – Robert Bresson, for instance, went to famous extremes in his quest to purge theatrical markers from his work, while other filmmakers like Kenji Mizoguchi, Manoel de Oliveira, Straub-Huillet and Jacques Rivette embraced elements from theatre in equally daring ways. As the 21st century steams ahead, do you think cinema’s preoccupation with theatre is diminishing, or will auteurs continue wrestle with the medium’s complex debt to theatrical illusion, role play, performance?

And Alain Resnais. The 50s and 60s were the era of intellectuals; filmmakers were often theatre lovers if not actively involved in it, hence, it was very natural for them to contemplate on the relation between these two art forms. As the form of cinema progresses, filmmakers’ concerns shift, and audience’s taste are more and more likely to be shaped by advertising campaigns and mass media. There may not be as many works with such erudition in our time, but films that deal with the magical power of fictionalisaton and representation will continue to evolve, because the pursuit of reality is also a big part of life. Both theatre and cinema strive to intensify our understanding of life and make sense of our world, I don’t see this being replaced in the near future by any other form of representation, even when new narrative forms (such as new media art, interactive story-telling and Virtual Reality) emerge. There is something sacred about pure cinema and its interaction or flirtation with reality. Recently, José Luis Guerín’s The Academy of Muses (2015) is a fascinating experiment.

This program will be the final installment of the MCA’s Contemporary Film Program, which has been a wonderful success in 2016. In some ways, it’s a perfect way to conclude: looking at the late works of these mercurial 20th century masters – artists whose eyes were always so fixed on the future. In particular, it’s an honour to have this opportunity to publicly commemorate Rivette at the MCA. His death earlier this year felt really significant, and such a profound loss for cinema. What do you think has made his work, at all stages in his career, so strikingly 'contemporary’?

This could develop into a very long essay! I may attempt to make a few notes…

Above all, as written in my notes, Rivette’s cinema addresses the nature of cinema itself. This will make his cinema forever young, stimulating and relevant.

Rivette’s sense of time is exceptional. Other than the theatre, he must have seen a certain power in time and the depiction of time. This doesn’t only refer to the duration of many of his films, but also his preference of real-time shooting. How do you capture time? Probably only through space, the movement or suspension in space. His method of real-time shooting locks audience in; as we are drawn to be fixated on his characters’ actions, movements or their stagnant state, we eventually identify with that obsession or breakdown, we become one with what’s on screen (I am thinking of how Bulle Ogier repeatedly records messages in the tape machine in L’amour Fou, 1969). It was almost like a process of being possessed! In some cases, I do feel that Rivette’s cinema is one of initiation, of enticing audience into another state but also into another form of appreciation. His persistence in going into details of life, of showing life as it is, and sometimes going into digression just as life is, is signatory. Take Joan the Maiden (Part 1 & Part 2, 1994) for example, his version of Joan d’Arc is the most realistic and down to earth among all others. Rather than portraying Joan as a Saint, an idol or a myth like Dryer or Bresson, he was interested in the rich details of life around this humanized, sacred spirit. It is profoundly moving.

Rivette’s cinema follows no conventions or rules, it has a lot to do with existence, but not in a heavily theoretical or meditative manner. Much like Rohmer, he embraced the playful, adventurous nature of life and took joy in letting go, in allowing his characters map out their adventure. In Celine and Julie Go Boating (1974) and Le Pont du Nord (1981), he indulged his girls to turn the city of Paris into a playground or the base of a board game. If these two films demonstrated Rivetter’s celebration of the feminine spirit and its ability to invent, Secret Defense (1998), much less a playful film, maintains the central idea of chasing, finding and pursuing, whilst in this case the feminine’s power lies in uncovering/discovering. There is something very revolting in Rivette, when he subverts the patriarchal values of order and logic.

Both Out 1 (1971) and L’amour Fou deal extensively with theatre and the process of artistic creation which is timeless; the collapse of the artists reflect how Rivette was acutely in tune with the anxiety experienced by thinking men in modern time. Though his later films, namely La belle Noiseuse (1991), The Story of Marie and Julien (2003) and Around a Small Mountain (2009), are less about theatre, they are nonetheless powerful explorations of creation and obsession – something very central in his oeuvre.

And yet, on the other hand, his treatment of classic text is equally fascinating. In The Nun (1966), Wuthering Heights (1985) and Don’t Touch the Axe (2007), his preoccupation with the “madness” aspects of these stories and the psychological state of his characters distinguish him from any kind of conventional literary adaptations.

France in the 20th century was such an influential centre of cinephilia, producing the New Wave and Left Bank movements, as well as serving as the base for the Cahiers du Cinema journal. For the MCA you’ve picked three French films, and yet your programming at BAPFF is a fantastic reminder of the increasing diversity of voices in contemporary cinema. Do you think screen culture’s centre of gravity is shifting away from Western Europe?

It is probably becoming more collaborative and diversified, with co-productions being the new model of filmmaking or financing – be it pan-European, pan-Asian, European-Asian, or American-Asian. It is interesting that many European producers and financiers are taking a keen interest in filmmakers from the Asia Pacific, with some championing smaller scale, independent works, so I am hopeful for the future. For foreign productions that aspire to break into the Asian market, they are going to have to work collaboratively with writers and directors who are able to offer stories that resonate with domestic audience. These new collaborative models will result in a process of merging, shifting and negotiating, I do hope that individual voices will not become marginalized or compromised.

In a film about your life: who would direct it? Who would play you?

It would either be Eric Rohmer or Mikio Naurse, depending on which part of me that was to be portrayed. It is a bit egotistic to think about who would play me, but if I have to answer this question, it might be… Jean Seberg.

Interview conducted by James Vaughan and Jeremy Elphick.


Contemporary Film Program

Saturday 10 December, 2pm: The Romance of Astrea and Celadon

Saturday 17 December, 2pm: Around a Small Mountain

Saturday 24 December, 2pm: 21 Nights with Patti

Kiki Fung

Kiki Fung

Your mugshot

James Vaughan

Sydney-based writer and director

In 2013, he received the award for Emerging Australian Filmmaker at the Melbourne International Film Festival. He is a member of the director’s collective Fountain Vista and is currently writing his first feature.

Learn more

– Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus